Ricardo Guzman's profile picture
Image from {frontmatter.title}

Google's AI Moat: The Flywheel Nobody Can Replicate (Part 2)

2026, January 21st - by Ricardo Guzman

Google Google Deepmind AI LLMs Data Machine Learning RLHF Distribution Gemini

You know what’s crazy?

While OpenAI is out here begging people to try ChatGPT and Microsoft is practically shoving Copilot down everyone’s throat with Windows updates…

Google is just sitting there, casually collecting data from 13.7 billion searches per day.

Not per month. Per day.

That’s like having the entire planet constantly telling you exactly what they want, what they think, and what they find useful. In real-time. Every single day.

But here’s the thing that keeps me up at night: the data is just the beginning.

In Part 1, we talked about how Google built the ultimate hardware and software stack with their TPUs and JAX. That’s the engine.

But an engine is useless without fuel. And Google doesn’t just have fuel - they have a self-refilling, self-improving, planetary-scale fuel production facility.

This is what separates Google from literally everyone else in the AI race.

While competitors are training on static web scrapes and desperately trying to build user bases, Google is operating a perpetual motion machine that gets smarter with every YouTube video watched, every search refined, and every map direction requested.

Let’s talk about the flywheel.

2. The Unassailable Flywheel: Data, Distribution, and the Real-Time Learning Loop

Here’s the uncomfortable truth for Google’s competitors: you can buy GPUs, you can hire researchers, you can even copy architectures.

What you absolutely cannot replicate is two decades of entrenched, billion-user products that generate continuous, high-quality feedback signals.

This isn’t just an advantage. It’s a structural moat that compounds with time.

Google’s ecosystem functions as a self-improving intelligence engine - a virtuous cycle that continuously:

And here’s the kicker: each revolution of this flywheel makes the next one faster.

While OpenAI needs to convince people to use ChatGPT, Google just needs people to… keep using Google. Which they’re already doing. 8 billion searches a day worth of “already doing.”

2.1 The Data Reservoir: Why Google’s Data is Unfairly Better

“But everyone has data! Common Crawl is free! Anyone can scrape the web!”

Sure. And anyone can also eat at McDonald’s, but that doesn’t make you a Michelin-star chef.

The difference between Common Crawl and Google’s data is like comparing a library book from 2019 to having a live stream of humanity’s consciousness.

Let me break down why Google’s data isn’t just bigger - it’s categorically superior in ways that matter for AI.

The Quantitative Reality Check

First, let’s talk numbers, because they’re genuinely absurd:

Now here’s my favorite stat from the DOJ antitrust trial (because nothing reveals truth like courtroom testimony under oath):

It would take Microsoft’s Bing 17 years to collect the same query data that Google gathers in 13 months.

Read that again.

This isn’t a gap you close with clever engineering or extra funding. This is a structural, cumulative advantage built over two decades.

You don’t catch up to this. You just don’t.

The Qualitative Advantage: Why Google’s Data is the Perfect AI Fuel

But here’s where it gets really interesting. The volume is impressive, sure. But the quality is what creates the actual moat.

Google’s data has three characteristics that make it perfect for training frontier AI models:

1. Real-Time: A Live Stream of Human Consciousness

Unlike competitors training on static datasets (looking at you, Common Crawl), Google’s data is a continuously updating stream of what humanity is thinking about right now.

New slang? Google knows it the moment it starts trending.

Breaking news? Google’s models are learning about it as it unfolds.

Emerging trends? Cultural shifts? New ways people express ideas? Google captures it all in real-time.

This means their models stay current and relevant in a way that batch-trained models simply cannot. The world changes, and Google’s models change with it.

2. Natively Multimodal: The Training Data Foundation Models Dream About

Here’s something beautiful: Google doesn’t need to artificially construct multimodal datasets.

Their data is inherently multimodal because that’s just how their products work:

This is the perfect, organically generated training corpus for building sophisticated models like Gemini that need to understand the world the way humans do - across multiple modalities simultaneously.

While competitors are stitching together separate text, image, and video datasets and hoping they align, Google’s data is already aligned by design because it comes from real human interactions that naturally span multiple modalities.

3. Reflects User Intent and Feedback: The Ultimate RLHF Machine

But this is the real killer feature of Google’s data - and it’s the one that keeps competitors up at night.

Google’s data isn’t just passive content. It’s a continuous record of active human intent and feedback.

Every search query is a question.

Every clicked link is a vote for relevance.

Every refined search is explicit feedback on what didn’t work.

Every watched YouTube video is a signal of interest.

Every accepted AI suggestion in Gmail is implicit approval.

This is Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) at planetary scale, happening organically, 24/7, across billions of users.

Google is essentially running the world’s largest, continuous RLHF experiment without even trying. It’s just a byproduct of people using their products.

Quick Privacy Note: Google explicitly states that customer data in enterprise products (Workspace) and paid APIs isn’t used for training generative models without permission. The training advantage comes from aggregated, anonymized signals from free, public consumer products. Important distinction.

2.2 The Distribution Engine: Turning Billions of Users Into a Global AI Laboratory

Okay, so Google has the best data. Cool.

But data sitting in servers doesn’t improve models. You need to deploy, test, iterate, and learn.

And this is where Google’s second unfair advantage kicks in: they own the world’s primary digital distribution channels.

Instantaneous Deployment at Global Scale

When Google decides to ship a new AI feature, they can hit a button and reach over a billion people almost overnight.

Let me paint you a picture:

For comparison, Microsoft’s Copilot - their big strategic AI bet - has a user base that’s over 50 times smaller than Google’s AI Overviews alone.

What does this mean in practice?

It means Google can gather more real-world usage data in a single day than most competitors can in a year.

That’s not hyperbole. That’s just math.

The Flywheel Effect: How Google’s AI Gets Better While You Sleep

This combination of massive data and massive distribution creates something truly special: a self-reinforcing virtuous cycle that accelerates with every revolution.

Here’s how the flywheel works in practice:

Step 1: Integrate Better Products

Google deeply embeds their latest AI models (Gemini) into core billion-user products:

Step 2: Attract and Retain More Users

These AI-enhanced features make the products more useful and indispensable. Users who might have considered switching to alternatives now stay because the AI features genuinely make their lives easier.

New users sign up because, well, the product is just better than the alternatives.

Step 3: Generate More High-Quality Data

Now here’s where it gets beautiful.

Those billions of daily interactions with AI features generate an enormous, continuous stream of high-quality feedback:

Each interaction is implicitly or explicitly teaching the model what humans find useful.

Step 4: Build Better Models

Google’s engineers feed this constant influx of real-world feedback back into the training and fine-tuning process.

They can rapidly:

Step 5: Repeat and Accelerate

The improved models get deployed back into the products (remember, instant global distribution), making them even better.

Which attracts more users.

Which generates more data.

Which builds better models.

Which gets deployed to more users.

And the flywheel spins faster.

Each revolution compounds the advantage.

Why Competitors Can’t Replicate This

This is not a flywheel that OpenAI, Anthropic, or even Microsoft can build from scratch.

Meanwhile, Google just needs people to keep doing what they’re already doing: searching, watching videos, checking email, getting directions.

The flywheel is already spinning at full speed.

While competitors must actively recruit users to generate feedback, Google harvests it organically from the daily digital lives of billions of people.

This creates a sustainable, scalable, and - let’s be honest - structurally superior mechanism for continuous AI improvement.

The Planetary-Scale Learning Machine

Let me tie this all together with a thought experiment.

Imagine you’re training an AI model and you want to know if a particular feature is useful.

If you’re OpenAI:

If you’re Google:

This isn’t just faster iteration. This is a fundamentally different category of AI development.

Google isn’t building AI in a lab and hoping it works in the real world.

Google is building AI in the real world, with real humans, at real scale, in real time.

Every query is a test. Every interaction is a data point. Every product is a laboratory with billions of participants who don’t even know they’re participating.

Conclusion

So here’s where we are:

Part 1: Google has the best hardware and software stack (TPUs, JAX, XLA) to train and deploy models efficiently and cheaply.

Part 2 (this post): Google has an unstoppable data and distribution flywheel that makes their models better every single day without even trying.

The TPUs give them the computational advantage.

The flywheel gives them the learning advantage.

Combined? It’s like having both the fastest car and the only map to the finish line.

But there’s one more piece to this puzzle.

We’ve talked about the chips. We’ve talked about the data and distribution. But there’s a third pillar that ties everything together and makes Google truly dangerous in the long term.

Part 3 is coming: We’ll talk about Google’s research culture, their integration of DeepMind, the talent density advantage, and why their approach to AI development might be the most sustainable in the industry.

Stay tuned.